Connect
BLOG ENTRY
Youth Rights, Dignity, and the Anti-Democratic Values of Public Schooling

As students, we are told that we are being made into an “informed citizenry” capable of maintaining a vibrant democracy. Indeed, we are told that we must give up most of our constitutional rights in the name of achieving this goal. We are compelled to attend an institution where our every action, from speaking, to moving, to going to the bathroom is strictly controlled by an authority figure. We have no right to due process in this institution, the word of the school authorities is final, and in fact our meager protestations of any wrongful accusation are often called “disrespectful” and used as another justification for punishment. We are also limited in our freedom of speech and of assembly, we cannot leave class to assemble and petition our government and the Supreme Court has explicitly prohibited any speech that would disrupt the educational process. Most of the first 18 years of our lives are fundamentally shaped by a process in which we have absolutely no say. This seems explicitly nonsensical. Should we give up our democratic rights in the name of preserving democracy? Does an institution which has power over countless individuals without giving them any representation or say in how this institution is run really the best preparation for a democratic society? Rather than creating an informed citizenry capable of engaging in the democratic process, compulsory education creates apathy, harms our ability to engage in real education, and actively harms democracy.

Is it surprising that we do not care about what we are taught in our classes? Is it surprising that we are not interested in learning? When someone has been forced to do something against their will for so many years there is bound to be some resentment. More than that, there is bound to be some resistance. The disengagement from school and learning is not some inherent quality of the adolescent; it is a very natural defense mechanism against control. Can you imagine someone saying, “I know I have no real choice in how I spend the majority of my time, and I couldn’t be more happy or grateful!” Disengagement is the only way to stay sane under a system of compulsory education. When most of our daily lives are controlled by others, the only way we can still be free is by not granting them respect or legitimacy. If we are able to say to ourselves, “None of this really matters. I may have to go to school, but at least I am free to hate it,” then the constant condescension from teachers can be shrugged off, and the lack of respect from school officials can be ignored.

The idea that human beings are naturally apathetic and have to be forcibly educated in order to be informed about the world around them is absolutely ludicrous. Were Plato’s ideas the product of an education system? Even Albert Einstein felt that schooling was hindering rather than helping his education. His younger sister said that during his adolescence "the style of teaching in most subjects was repugnant to him." he also rebelled against “the systematic training in the worship of authority." (Qtd. in “Einstein as a Student” by Dudley Herschbach). Of course, this is very clear to these so called “naturally apathetic” adolescents. If we were able to determine what we wanted to learn and asked people with more experience to help us learn it, we would be able to pursue our natural curiosity and desire to learn. An example of just such an education in practice was described in a March 14 story in the New York Times:

I recently followed a group of eight public high school students, aged 15 to 17, in western Massachusetts as they designed and ran their own school within a school. They represented the usual range: two were close to dropping out before they started the project, while others were honors students. They named their school the Independent Project....they were responsible for monitoring one another’s work and giving one another feedback. There were no grades. (find full article here)

The experiment was highly successful. The students were able to rekindle their love of learning and worked on several projects in academic areas that they were interested in. Of course, it is incredible that I am even having to cite evidence to prove this point, we are well aware that we are not apathetic zombies. We are free thinking human beings who aspire to freedom just as much as any adult under an undemocratic system. The real result of compulsory education seems to be to accustom young people from early childhood to arbitrary authority and a fundamental lack of democratic ideals. Not only that, it is also highly selective about what it chooses to teach. As Carol Black says in her essay Occupy Your Brain:

While your kids are very busy toiling over algebra and chemistry, international trade agreements are being forged and currencies are being manipulated by entities that most Americans don’t even know the names of, much less the inner workings of.  Kids are compelled to solve quadratic equations and write essays on Shakespeare, and they graduate without understanding how to calculate the interest on credit card debt or decode a mortgage agreement.  They learn an old fable called “How a Bill Becomes Law,” while corporate lobbyists draft legislation that will pollute their air and water, deny them health care and unemployment benefits, and put barely tested drugs on the market and genetically modified organisms in their food system. (Find full article here)

The public education system not only hinders our ability to be members of a democracy by accustoming us to unjustified authority, it also seeks to mask the undemocratic nature of society at large through the education which it forces us to ingest.  The public education system is part and parcel to many of the unjust systems criticized by the occupy movement.

Of course, against such a pervasive structure of oppression we are confronted with the problem of how to escape, how to be free. I believe the answer is simple--just leave, or better yet, take control of the school. Imagine a world where you can spend your time learning about what you love. Imagine a world where you invite adults to teach you. Imagine a world where you have the inalienable rights of a human being. This world can never be achieved as long as our education s dictated by a state hierarchy and their corporate partners. It is possible to drop out of school and teach yourself, in fact a realistic way that you can go about doing this can be found in books and magazines dedicated to the un-schooling movement such as The Teenage Liberation Handbook (pdf here). It is possible to determine your own education by dropping out and adopting un-schooled or home schooled approach. However, more than just escaping the public school system we need to break it down. In the name of dignity, democracy, and real education high school students need a movement on the scale of Occupy Wall Street and the Arab Spring. We are free human beings; we should demand the right to teach ourselves.

Comments
11
John Stuart said:
Posted January 21, 2012 - 3:56pm

It will all be merely formal if we don't avail ourselves the resources required to be free. There is nothing liberating about abandoning school into poverty...

If we can't get the resources to learn what we desire we will take them! Steal books, copy movies, share files; occupy abandoned buildings and turn them into theaters, kitchens, studios, and concert halls! Create national, international networks of conviviality to collaborate on subjects we find interesting! Build websites, blogs! Take to the road once more, bum rides on trains, trucks, buses and hitchhike!

Derek Sheppard said:
Posted January 23, 2012 - 5:44am

Dylan, it is hard to disagree with what you say about schools. I often say what you're saying! However, there are schools, and then there are schools that operate so that young people are free, to choose, to make decisions, to take control of their lives, including about the hiring and firing of staff, admissions of students, about plant and equipment, about school budgets, vote in secret ballots, and are part of thriving democracies. Have a look at Sudbury model Schools. They are private, not public schools, and they require sacrifices because fees must be paid. But public schools also cost money too, through taxes. Check out the Sudbury Valley School first: http://www.sudval.org/index.html
Regards, Derek

Dawn Radcliffe-... said:
Posted January 29, 2012 - 1:27pm

Yes, check out the Sudbury/Democratic schools. From the website Derek offers:

"Sudbury Valley School is a place where people decide for themselves how to spend their days. Here, students of all ages determine what they will do, as well as when, how, and where they will do it. This freedom is at the heart of the school; it belongs to the students as their right, not to be violated.

The fundamental premises of the school are simple: that all people are curious by nature; that the most efficient, long-lasting, and profound learning takes place when started and pursued by the learner; that all people are creative if they are allowed to develop their unique talents; that age-mixing among students promotes growth in all members of the group; and that freedom is essential to the development of personal responsibility. "

Dylan said:
Posted January 30, 2012 - 8:17pm

Yes I definitely like the Sudbury model a lot. I guess my main point is that this should be the type of education available to all people regardless of income.

Bruce Zeines said:
Posted January 24, 2012 - 11:25am

Dylan. I am a founding parent at a Democratic Free School where children are empowered to take control of the direction of their own learning. I write about it on my blog at http://bzeines.wordpress.com/ I have reposted your article (with appropriate links) which I find articulate and passionate in expressing exactly what the problems with our education system are. I advocate for obliterating that system, and replacing it with a more natural process, which has proven itself over and over again. Unschooling, freeschools, democratic education and Sudbury all speak to this approach. The graduates of "free" school are the critical thinkers, passionate learners, and problem solvers that will be needed to resurrect this country after the dust settles from all the current madness. I hope that we can dialogue in the future as I, and my family, share your aspiring values.

Dylan said:
Posted February 4, 2012 - 1:49pm

Yes I would love to talk with you more. I love unschooling and the freeschools. You can find me on Facebook.

Carol Baker said:
Posted January 28, 2012 - 10:00am

Some interesting points, but a few key items missed. At the elementary level, at least, children do not yet have the skills, tools, and maturity to make major decisions about their education. Here, the democratic process falls to their parents who (should) have input into what the school looks like, vote for their school board members, vote on the school budget, meet with teachers and administrators, and serve as advocate for their children. It does make sense that all students have a developmentally appropriate amount of choice within the school day that caters to their ability and their interests, and that as children grow (and develop) they are given gradually increasing autonomy over their education, especially when they show that they are able to handle that responsibility (which not all teenagers can due to a variety of factors in their lives.).

The schools around here (Vermont) are structured so that children themselves create the classroom and school rules and make decisions every day about what to do and how to do it.

John Stuart said:
Posted January 31, 2012 - 7:49pm

No, "developmentally appropriate" is an industrial assumption that exists merely to maximize the productions of "healthy adults". Freud's definition of thus: One who can love and work. We fundamentally disagree with Freud and Jean Piaget, author of the modern notion of "developmental maturation" now en vogue in public schools. A healthy person loves. He/She does not work, they simply do as they love. The assignation of a "correct and natural progression" is bogus science that can't account for its own assumptions: mainly the one that industrial society is a "state of nature".

A truly free school would offer the resources to children of all ages to undertake any task, be it "play" or "work". I refuse to be told that some kids are born "lazy or lacking passion"; it is beaten out of them by the expectations of adults and their broken system. If a child would rather play outside or draw or swim or sing than study math, afford them the freedom to do so as long as they please; and vice versa, we don't all need to learn to paint. Be there to answer his or her questions, be there for him or her to observe you do your labor of love so he/she may learn to love, not to begrudgingly work.

This is freedom, not some kind of progressing grade system. "At this age you may be this free to choose and this informed and you must also at the minimum know these things" cannot be assuaged by really involved parents at PTA meetings. This problem is global, think of it as so and act on it so.

Dawn Radcliffe-... said:
Posted January 29, 2012 - 1:25pm

Yes, check out the Sudbury/Democratic Schools. From the website Derek offered:

"udbury Valley School is a place where people decide for themselves how to spend their days. Here, students of all ages determine what they will do, as well as when, how, and where they will do it. This freedom is at the heart of the school; it belongs to the students as their right, not to be violated.

The fundamental premises of the school are simple: that all people are curious by nature; that the most efficient, long-lasting, and profound learning takes place when started and pursued by the learner; that all people are creative if they are allowed to develop their unique talents; that age-mixing among students promotes growth in all members of the group; and that freedom is essential to the development of personal responsibility. "

Dawn Radcliffe-... said:
Posted January 29, 2012 - 3:43pm

From the book "And Now for Something Completely Different" (re Sudbury Schools):
“We thought that it made good sense for a school to be run democratically in a country where all forms of government are democratic. From the smallest town to the Federal level, all our institutions have been designed to be democratically controlled in one way or another. We asked ourselves why schools shouldn’t be run this way too, and the more we thought about it, the more we thought they should be. In a democratic school, the adult members of the community could apply to the school the same standards of citizenship they applied to their outside lives. And the children in the school could be nurtured in the principles and practices that make up the democratic way of life. By the time they became adults, responsible community citizenship would be natural to them, because they would have lived with it for a long time.”

John Stuart said:
Posted January 31, 2012 - 7:50pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summerhill_School

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login Register