“Democrats Eat Their Own” Is Not News

Somewhere I remember it being poor writing form to begin a story with "Once upon a time" – trite and overdone was the rap on it. I wonder how many articles written buy conservatives begin with, “Democrats never cease to amaze me?” Well at the risk of poor writing form, I’ll start another, “Democrats never cease to amaze me”- the truth demands no less.

I was perusing this Op-Ed article about the John Murtha situation in The (Northeastern PA) Times Tribune and admiring the liberal ability and perseverance in creating false images. (The Photoshop Party, again.) In this case, the pretense that their “Kerry the war hero” substitute, Rep. Murtha, was always a super hawk on Iraq.

That Murtha was soft on this Iraq venture has been documented beyond need and is not the subject of this piece of writing. Democrat hypocrisy is. I know that this concept also has been documented routinely, without any resultant shameful response or alteration of Democrat behavior, for that matter. We’ll have a go at it anyhow (exposing democrat hypocrisy), as maybe, just maybe, there is one honest person who isn’t yet aware or convinced of their willingness to deceive.

So now, in one of the largest image remake attempts ever, the left is telling us that to compare someone to their patron saint, Michael Moore, is to impugn them!

Michael Moore? Is that the same Michael Moore that was the sanctified icon of the left, the same Michael Moore that received millions of dollars worth of free air time to push his disingenuous anti-Bush vindictive?

Could that be the same Michael Moore that created that outrageous propaganda hit piece, Fahrenheit 9/11, that the left falsely called a “documentary masterpiece” – the flick that the left of the world flooded to see like so many soulless extras from the set of Night of the Living Dead?

Is this the same Michael Moore that was graced (I thought disgraced personally) by being granted the privilege of being seated next to Jimmy Carter at the Democrats’ convention?

Why it is apostasy, I tell you, shear apostasy!

I rushed to the Michael Moore website to see what could have caused this historical turn-a- bout. I found nothing had changed – the adolescent hostility against Bush and conservatives was still there. What then cause the divorce? Why did the left suddenly find this man as disgusting, as obnoxious, as undesirable as he really is? I realized that they hadn’t showcased him for a while. Then eureka I saw the light!

After their defeat in '04, they promised to present a different picture (there’s that Photoshop Party again) of their party. When the results came in from the last election and they studied the raw statistics and found that people of faith and traditional family values would not support their silliness, they responded quickly with a quick push of a couple of (truth is relative) Photoshop buttons, whereupon they suddenly had traditional values too. They weren’t against religion, and why, (just look at Hillary our other Patron Saint) we too can be strong on defense.

They needed badly to put aside their real image, so it became necessary for Democrats to be against Michael Moore, after they were for him. For the game is to merely pretend for now, to demonize him – wink, wink!

Then is it really apostasy? Not on your life! Michael Moore is temporarily being used as a “pariah of convenience” by the liberals.

It is just more of the same old deceptive hypocrisy. They still love and adore this pillar of all that is wrong with liberals. They just need him to be conceived as evil and not part of their image, for the moment, if for no other reason than to excoriate those conservatives who compared Murtha to him. (By the way, it’s a poor comparison – Murtha, though wrong, deserves better than to be compared to this pompous buffoon.)

No, democrats never cease to amaze me. To serve their deceitful ends, they’ll even pretend to eat one of their own! (Soulless, of course — goes down easier that way.)